if jay carney and president obama and others are to be believed, white house is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the c.i.a. and/or the state department. >> alisyn: we do know now as a result of this week that the state department did change the c.i.a. talking points, original c.i.a. talking points had a half of dozen references to an an al-qaeda or an affiliated group. they expunged references to al-qaeda. is there often this sort of fight between state department and c.i.a. where they both take a crack at talking points? >> it's not easily a fight but a collaborative process. another the behest of whatever administration is in charge. because the white house, they are the owners of the talking points. they are the ones that have to go out there, whether it was the ambassador susan rice or whatever the situation is, they are talking points. so the c.i.a. is basically what they always are, an objective analysis and collection point for intelligence. for months and months before the attack, they were report becoming a deteriorating security situation. they were reporting on the numerous attack